tmp/tmpk59reolx/{from.md → to.md}
RENAMED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
## Contract-violation handling <a id="support.contract">[[support.contract]]</a>
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
### Header `<contracts>` synopsis <a id="contracts.syn">[[contracts.syn]]</a>
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
The header `<contracts>` defines types for reporting information about
|
| 6 |
+
contract violations [[basic.contract.eval]].
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 9 |
+
// all freestanding
|
| 10 |
+
namespace std::contracts {
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
enum class assertion_kind : unspecified {
|
| 13 |
+
pre = 1,
|
| 14 |
+
post = 2,
|
| 15 |
+
assert = 3
|
| 16 |
+
};
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
enum class evaluation_semantic : unspecified {
|
| 19 |
+
ignore = 1,
|
| 20 |
+
observe = 2,
|
| 21 |
+
enforce = 3,
|
| 22 |
+
quick_enforce = 4
|
| 23 |
+
};
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
enum class detection_mode : unspecified {
|
| 26 |
+
predicate_false = 1,
|
| 27 |
+
evaluation_exception = 2
|
| 28 |
+
};
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
class contract_violation {
|
| 31 |
+
// no user-accessible constructor
|
| 32 |
+
public:
|
| 33 |
+
contract_violation(const contract_violation&) = delete;
|
| 34 |
+
contract_violation& operator=(const contract_violation&) = delete;
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
see below ~contract_violation();
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
const char* comment() const noexcept;
|
| 39 |
+
contracts::detection_mode detection_mode() const noexcept;
|
| 40 |
+
exception_ptr evaluation_exception() const noexcept;
|
| 41 |
+
bool is_terminating() const noexcept;
|
| 42 |
+
assertion_kind kind() const noexcept;
|
| 43 |
+
source_location location() const noexcept;
|
| 44 |
+
evaluation_semantic semantic() const noexcept;
|
| 45 |
+
};
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
void invoke_default_contract_violation_handler(const contract_violation&);
|
| 48 |
+
}
|
| 49 |
+
```
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
### Enumerations <a id="support.contract.enum">[[support.contract.enum]]</a>
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
*Recommended practice:* For all enumerations in
|
| 54 |
+
[[support.contract.enum]], if implementation-defined enumerators are
|
| 55 |
+
provided, they should have a minimum value of 1000.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
The enumerators of `assertion_kind` correspond to the syntactic forms of
|
| 58 |
+
a contract assertion [[basic.contract.general]], with meanings listed in
|
| 59 |
+
Table [[tab:support.contract.enum.kind]].
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
**Table: Enum `assertion_kind`** <a id="support.contract.enum.kind">[support.contract.enum.kind]</a>
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
| Name | Meaning |
|
| 64 |
+
| -------- | ------------------------- |
|
| 65 |
+
| `pre` | A precondition assertion |
|
| 66 |
+
| `post` | A postcondition assertion |
|
| 67 |
+
| `assert` | An *assertion-statement* |
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
The enumerators of `evaluation_semantic` correspond to the evaluation
|
| 71 |
+
semantics with which a contract assertion may be evaluated
|
| 72 |
+
[[basic.contract.eval]], with meanings listed in Table
|
| 73 |
+
[[tab:support.contract.enum.semantic]].
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
**Table: Enum `evaluation_semantic`** <a id="support.contract.enum.semantic">[support.contract.enum.semantic]</a>
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
| Name | Meaning |
|
| 78 |
+
| --------------- | --------------------------------- |
|
| 79 |
+
| `ignore` | Ignore evaluation semantic |
|
| 80 |
+
| `observe` | Observe evaluation semantic |
|
| 81 |
+
| `enforce` | Enforce evaluation semantic |
|
| 82 |
+
| `quick_enforce` | Quick-enforce evaluation semantic |
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
The enumerators of `detection_mode` correspond to the manners in which a
|
| 86 |
+
contract violation can be identified [[basic.contract.eval]], with
|
| 87 |
+
meanings listed in Table~ [[tab:support.contract.enum.detection]].
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
**Table: Enum `detection_mode`** <a id="support.contract.enum.detection">[support.contract.enum.detection]</a>
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
| Name | Meaning |
|
| 92 |
+
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
| 93 |
+
| `predicate_false` | The predicate of the contract assertion evaluated to `false` or would have evaluated to `false`. |
|
| 94 |
+
| `evaluation_exception` | An uncaught exception occurred during evaluation of the contract assertion. |
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
### Class `contract_violation` <a id="support.contract.violation">[[support.contract.violation]]</a>
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
The class `contract_violation` defines the type of objects used to
|
| 100 |
+
represent a contract violation that has been detected during the
|
| 101 |
+
evaluation of a contract assertion with a particular evaluation semantic
|
| 102 |
+
[[basic.contract.eval]]. Objects of this type can be created only by the
|
| 103 |
+
implementation. It is *implementation-defined* whether the destructor is
|
| 104 |
+
virtual.
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 107 |
+
const char* comment() const noexcept;
|
| 108 |
+
```
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
*Returns:* An *implementation-defined* NTMBS in the ordinary literal
|
| 111 |
+
encoding [[lex.charset]].
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
*Recommended practice:* The string returned should contain a textual
|
| 114 |
+
representation of the predicate of the violated contract assertion or an
|
| 115 |
+
empty string if storing a textual representation is undesired.
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
[*Note 1*: The string can represent a truncated, reformatted, or
|
| 118 |
+
summarized rendering of the predicate, before or after
|
| 119 |
+
preprocessing. — *end note*]
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 122 |
+
contracts::detection_mode detection_mode() const noexcept;
|
| 123 |
+
```
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
*Returns:* The enumerator value corresponding to the manner in which the
|
| 126 |
+
contract violation was identified.
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 129 |
+
exception_ptr evaluation_exception() const noexcept;
|
| 130 |
+
```
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
*Returns:* If the contract violation occurred because the evaluation of
|
| 133 |
+
the predicate exited via an exception, an `exception_ptr` object that
|
| 134 |
+
refers to that exception or a copy of that exception; otherwise, a null
|
| 135 |
+
`exception_ptr` object.
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 138 |
+
bool is_terminating() const noexcept;
|
| 139 |
+
```
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
*Returns:* `true` if the evaluation semantic is a terminating
|
| 142 |
+
semantic [[basic.contract.eval]]; otherwise, `false`.
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 145 |
+
assertion_kind kind() const noexcept;
|
| 146 |
+
```
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
*Returns:* The enumerator value corresponding to the syntactic form of
|
| 149 |
+
the violated contract assertion.
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 152 |
+
source_location location() const noexcept;
|
| 153 |
+
```
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
*Returns:* A `source_location` object with *implementation-defined*
|
| 156 |
+
value.
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
*Recommended practice:* The value returned should be a default
|
| 159 |
+
constructed `source_location` object or a value identifying the violated
|
| 160 |
+
contract assertion:
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- When possible, if the violated contract assertion was a precondition,
|
| 163 |
+
the source location of the function invocation should be returned.
|
| 164 |
+
- Otherwise, the source location of the contract assertion should be
|
| 165 |
+
returned.
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 168 |
+
evaluation_semantic semantic() const noexcept;
|
| 169 |
+
```
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
*Returns:* The enumerator value corresponding to the evaluation semantic
|
| 172 |
+
with which the violated contract assertion was evaluated.
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
### Invoke default handler <a id="support.contract.invoke">[[support.contract.invoke]]</a>
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
``` cpp
|
| 177 |
+
void invoke_default_contract_violation_handler(const contract_violation& v);
|
| 178 |
+
```
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
*Effects:* Invokes the default contract-violation
|
| 181 |
+
handler [[basic.contract.handler]] with the argument `v`.
|
| 182 |
+
|