From Jason Turner

[iterator.concept.winc]

Diff to HTML by rtfpessoa

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. tmp/tmpx85c1n2y/{from.md → to.md} +90 -60
tmp/tmpx85c1n2y/{from.md → to.md} RENAMED
@@ -5,99 +5,126 @@ that can be incremented with the pre- and post-increment operators. The
5
  increment operations are not required to be equality-preserving, nor is
6
  the type required to be `equality_comparable`.
7
 
8
  ``` cpp
9
  template<class T>
10
- inline constexpr bool is-integer-like = see below; // exposition only
11
 
12
  template<class T>
13
- inline constexpr bool is-signed-integer-like = see below; // exposition only
14
 
15
  template<class I>
16
  concept weakly_incrementable =
17
- default_initializable<I> && movable<I> &&
18
  requires(I i) {
19
  typename iter_difference_t<I>;
20
  requires is-signed-integer-like<iter_difference_t<I>>;
21
  { ++i } -> same_as<I&>; // not required to be equality-preserving
22
  i++; // not required to be equality-preserving
23
  };
24
  ```
25
 
26
  A type `I` is an *integer-class type* if it is in a set of
27
- implementation-defined class types that behave as integer types do, as
28
- defined in below.
 
 
 
29
 
30
  The range of representable values of an integer-class type is the
31
- continuous set of values over which it is defined. The values 0 and 1
32
- are part of the range of every integer-class type. If any negative
33
- numbers are part of the range, the type is a
34
- *signed-integer-class type*; otherwise, it is an
35
- *unsigned-integer-class type*.
 
 
 
36
 
37
- For every integer-class type `I`, let `B(I)` be a hypothetical extended
38
- integer type of the same signedness with the smallest width
39
- [[basic.fundamental]] capable of representing the same range of values.
40
- The width of `I` is equal to the width of `B(I)`.
 
 
41
 
42
- Let `a` and `b` be objects of integer-class type `I`, let `x` and `y` be
43
- objects of type `B(I)` as described above that represent the same values
44
- as `a` and `b` respectively, and let `c` be an lvalue of any integral
45
- type.
46
 
47
- - For every unary operator `@` for which the expression `@x` is
48
- well-formed, `@a` shall also be well-formed and have the same value,
49
- effects, and value category as `@x` provided that value is
50
- representable by `I`. If `@x` has type `bool`, so too does `@a`; if
51
- `@x` has type `B(I)`, then `@a` has type `I`.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52
  - For every assignment operator `@=` for which `c @= x` is well-formed,
53
  `c @= a` shall also be well-formed and shall have the same value and
54
  effects as `c @= x`. The expression `c @= a` shall be an lvalue
55
  referring to `c`.
56
- - For every binary operator `@` for which `x @ y` is well-formed,
57
- `a @ b` shall also be well-formed and shall have the same value,
58
- effects, and value category as `x @ y` provided that value is
59
- representable by `I`. If `x @ y` has type `bool`, so too does `a @ b`;
60
- if `x @ y` has type `B(I)`, then `a @ b` has type `I`.
61
-
62
- Expressions of integer-class type are explicitly convertible to any
63
- integral type. Expressions of integral type are both implicitly and
64
- explicitly convertible to any integer-class type. Conversions between
65
- integral and integer-class types do not exit via an exception.
 
 
 
66
 
67
  An expression `E` of integer-class type `I` is contextually convertible
68
  to `bool` as if by `bool(E != I(0))`.
69
 
70
  All integer-class types model `regular` [[concepts.object]] and
71
- `totally_ordered` [[concept.totallyordered]].
72
 
73
  A value-initialized object of integer-class type has value 0.
74
 
75
  For every (possibly cv-qualified) integer-class type `I`,
76
- `numeric_limits<I>` is specialized such that:
 
 
77
 
78
- - `numeric_limits<I>::is_specialized` is `true`,
79
- - `numeric_limits<I>::is_signed` is `true` if and only if `I` is a
80
- signed-integer-class type,
81
- - `numeric_limits<I>::is_integer` is `true`,
82
- - `numeric_limits<I>::is_exact` is `true`,
83
- - `numeric_limits<I>::digits` is equal to the width of the integer-class
84
- type,
85
- - `numeric_limits<I>::digits10` is equal to
86
- `static_cast<int>(digits * log10(2))`, and
87
- - `numeric_limits<I>::min()` and `numeric_limits<I>::max()` return the
88
- lowest and highest representable values of `I`, respectively, and
89
- `numeric_limits<I>::lowest()` returns `numeric_limits<I>::{}min()`.
90
-
91
- A type `I` is *integer-like* if it models `integral<I>` or if it is an
92
- integer-class type. A type `I` is *signed-integer-like* if it models
93
- `signed_integral<I>` or if it is a signed-integer-class type. A type `I`
94
- is *unsigned-integer-like* if it models `unsigned_integral<I>` or if it
95
- is an unsigned-integer-class type.
96
 
97
  `is-integer-like<I>` is `true` if and only if `I` is an integer-like
98
- type. `is-signed-integer-like<I>` is `true` if and only if I is a
99
  signed-integer-like type.
100
 
101
  Let `i` be an object of type `I`. When `i` is in the domain of both pre-
102
  and post-increment, `i` is said to be *incrementable*. `I` models
103
  `weakly_incrementable<I>` only if
@@ -106,13 +133,16 @@ and post-increment, `i` is said to be *incrementable*. `I` models
106
  - If `i` is incrementable, then both `++i` and `i++` advance `i` to the
107
  next element.
108
  - If `i` is incrementable, then `addressof(++i)` is equal to
109
  `addressof(i)`.
110
 
111
- [*Note 1*: For `weakly_incrementable` types, `a` equals `b` does not
 
 
 
 
 
112
  imply that `++a` equals `++b`. (Equality does not guarantee the
113
- substitution property or referential transparency.) Algorithms on weakly
114
- incrementable types should never attempt to pass through the same
115
- incrementable value twice. They should be single-pass algorithms. These
116
- algorithms can be used with istreams as the source of the input data
117
- through the `istream_iterator` class template. — *end note*]
118
 
 
5
  increment operations are not required to be equality-preserving, nor is
6
  the type required to be `equality_comparable`.
7
 
8
  ``` cpp
9
  template<class T>
10
+ constexpr bool is-integer-like = see below; // exposition only
11
 
12
  template<class T>
13
+ constexpr bool is-signed-integer-like = see below; // exposition only
14
 
15
  template<class I>
16
  concept weakly_incrementable =
17
+ movable<I> &&
18
  requires(I i) {
19
  typename iter_difference_t<I>;
20
  requires is-signed-integer-like<iter_difference_t<I>>;
21
  { ++i } -> same_as<I&>; // not required to be equality-preserving
22
  i++; // not required to be equality-preserving
23
  };
24
  ```
25
 
26
  A type `I` is an *integer-class type* if it is in a set of
27
+ *implementation-defined* types that behave as integer types do, as
28
+ defined below.
29
+
30
+ [*Note 1*: An integer-class type is not necessarily a class
31
+ type. — *end note*]
32
 
33
  The range of representable values of an integer-class type is the
34
+ continuous set of values over which it is defined. For any integer-class
35
+ type, its range of representable values is either -2ᴺ⁻¹ to 2ᴺ⁻¹-1
36
+ (inclusive) for some integer N, in which case it is a
37
+ *signed-integer-class type*, or 0 to 2ᴺ-1 (inclusive) for some integer
38
+ N, in which case it is an *unsigned-integer-class type*. In both cases,
39
+ N is called the *width* of the integer-class type. The width of an
40
+ integer-class type is greater than that of every integral type of the
41
+ same signedness.
42
 
43
+ A type `I` other than cv `bool` is *integer-like* if it models
44
+ `integral<I>` or if it is an integer-class type. An integer-like type
45
+ `I` is *signed-integer-like* if it models `signed_integral<I>` or if it
46
+ is a signed-integer-class type. An integer-like type `I` is
47
+ *unsigned-integer-like* if it models `unsigned_integral<I>` or if it is
48
+ an unsigned-integer-class type.
49
 
50
+ For every integer-class type `I`, let `B(I)` be a unique hypothetical
51
+ extended integer type of the same signedness with the same width
52
+ [[basic.fundamental]] as `I`.
 
53
 
54
+ [*Note 2*: The corresponding hypothetical specialization
55
+ `numeric_limits<B(I)>` meets the requirements on `numeric_limits`
56
+ specializations for integral types [[numeric.limits]]. *end note*]
57
+
58
+ For every integral type `J`, let `B(J)` be the same type as `J`.
59
+
60
+ Expressions of integer-class type are explicitly convertible to any
61
+ integer-like type, and implicitly convertible to any integer-class type
62
+ of equal or greater width and the same signedness. Expressions of
63
+ integral type are both implicitly and explicitly convertible to any
64
+ integer-class type. Conversions between integral and integer-class types
65
+ and between two integer-class types do not exit via an exception. The
66
+ result of such a conversion is the unique value of the destination type
67
+ that is congruent to the source modulo 2ᴺ, where N is the width of the
68
+ destination type.
69
+
70
+ Let `a` be an object of integer-class type `I`, let `b` be an object of
71
+ integer-like type `I2` such that the expression `b` is implicitly
72
+ convertible to `I`, let `x` and `y` be, respectively, objects of type
73
+ `B(I)` and `B(I2)` as described above that represent the same values as
74
+ `a` and `b`, and let `c` be an lvalue of any integral type.
75
+
76
+ - The expressions `a++` and `a--` shall be prvalues of type `I` whose
77
+ values are equal to that of `a` prior to the evaluation of the
78
+ expressions. The expression `a++` shall modify the value of `a` by
79
+ adding `1` to it. The expression `a--` shall modify the value of `a`
80
+ by subtracting `1` from it.
81
+ - The expressions `++a`, `--a`, and `&a` shall be expression-equivalent
82
+ to `a += 1`, `a -= 1`, and `addressof(a)`, respectively.
83
+ - For every *unary-operator* `@` other than `&` for which the expression
84
+ `@x` is well-formed, `@a` shall also be well-formed and have the same
85
+ value, effects, and value category as `@x`. If `@x` has type `bool`,
86
+ so too does `@a`; if `@x` has type `B(I)`, then `@a` has type `I`.
87
  - For every assignment operator `@=` for which `c @= x` is well-formed,
88
  `c @= a` shall also be well-formed and shall have the same value and
89
  effects as `c @= x`. The expression `c @= a` shall be an lvalue
90
  referring to `c`.
91
+ - For every assignment operator `@=` for which `x @= y` is well-formed,
92
+ `a @= b` shall also be well-formed and shall have the same effects as
93
+ `x @= y`, except that the value that would be stored into `x` is
94
+ stored into `a`. The expression `a @= b` shall be an lvalue referring
95
+ to `a`.
96
+ - For every non-assignment binary operator `@` for which `x @ y` and
97
+ `y @ x` are well-formed, `a @ b` and `b @ a` shall also be well-formed
98
+ and shall have the same value, effects, and value category as `x @ y`
99
+ and `y @ x`, respectively. If `x @ y` or `y @ x` has type `B(I)`, then
100
+ `a @ b` or `b @ a`, respectively, has type `I`; if `x @ y` or `y @ x`
101
+ has type `B(I2)`, then `a @ b` or `b @ a`, respectively, has type
102
+ `I2`; if `x @ y` or `y @ x` has any other type, then `a @ b` or
103
+ `b @ a`, respectively, has that type.
104
 
105
  An expression `E` of integer-class type `I` is contextually convertible
106
  to `bool` as if by `bool(E != I(0))`.
107
 
108
  All integer-class types model `regular` [[concepts.object]] and
109
+ `three_way_comparable<strong_ordering>` [[cmp.concept]].
110
 
111
  A value-initialized object of integer-class type has value 0.
112
 
113
  For every (possibly cv-qualified) integer-class type `I`,
114
+ `numeric_limits<I>` is specialized such that each static data member `m`
115
+ has the same value as `numeric_limits<B(I)>::m`, and each static member
116
+ function `f` returns `I(numeric_limits<B(I)>::f())`.
117
 
118
+ For any two integer-like types `I1` and `I2`, at least one of which is
119
+ an integer-class type, `common_type_t<I1, I2>` denotes an integer-class
120
+ type whose width is not less than that of `I1` or `I2`. If both `I1` and
121
+ `I2` are signed-integer-like types, then `common_type_t<I1, I2>` is also
122
+ a signed-integer-like type.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
123
 
124
  `is-integer-like<I>` is `true` if and only if `I` is an integer-like
125
+ type. `is-signed-integer-like<I>` is `true` if and only if `I` is a
126
  signed-integer-like type.
127
 
128
  Let `i` be an object of type `I`. When `i` is in the domain of both pre-
129
  and post-increment, `i` is said to be *incrementable*. `I` models
130
  `weakly_incrementable<I>` only if
 
133
  - If `i` is incrementable, then both `++i` and `i++` advance `i` to the
134
  next element.
135
  - If `i` is incrementable, then `addressof(++i)` is equal to
136
  `addressof(i)`.
137
 
138
+ *Recommended practice:* The implementaton of an algorithm on a weakly
139
+ incrementable type should never attempt to pass through the same
140
+ incrementable value twice; such an algorithm should be a single-pass
141
+ algorithm.
142
+
143
+ [*Note 3*: For `weakly_incrementable` types, `a` equals `b` does not
144
  imply that `++a` equals `++b`. (Equality does not guarantee the
145
+ substitution property or referential transparency.) Such algorithms can
146
+ be used with istreams as the source of the input data through the
147
+ `istream_iterator` class template. *end note*]
 
 
148